- October 6th, 2025, 8:06 pm#5006677
I think Slimer is untapped live action real estate. I’ve seen Ghostbusters 2 quite a few times and showing two moments between Louis & Slimer hardly qualifies as “camaraderie”. Prejudging something as “played out” just isn’t how I feel one should look at things. Something is either funny or it’s not. It works or it doesn’t. It’s all in the execution. Can’t tell if it’s played out until it’s played.
What is a ghostbusters ghost? Maybe that different for everyone. To me? It’s a spirit almost incognizant that they are a dead person. Or that they use to be a person. They just…are. Like a song stuck on repeat. They can’t be as they were in life.
Ghosts are pests, not thinking feeling, conversing things. They are like gnats. Flies. Roaches.
Now yes the Mayor says HE was talking to Fiorello La Guardia in GB2, but what that means isn’t clear. And we don’t see it.
I would contrast that with the big bads of the movies. Gozer isn’t a ghost. It’s a Demi god. And Vigo was a warlock thing.
We see ghosts getting off the titanic. And they look and behave like the ghosts we expect. We see a humanoid library ghost. She doesn’t say “Hey could you please be quiet, this is a library”. Just “Shhhhh”.
The ghosts in ghostbusters aren’t exactly who they were in the real world when they lived and the reason for that is…
Ghostbusting. You start having ghosts like Melody and suddenly you are bringing up the ethical dilemma of shooting and trapping a spirit. And maybe that’s an avenue some of you want explored. I don’t. That’s not what Ghostbusters is or should be for me.
Now if you have Melody unable to communicate with Phoebe and THATS WHY Phoebe uses the soul sucker machine? Phoebe thinks it’s the only way she can hear what Melody has to say? And Melody infers thru, I don’t know, chess moves or game playing, that she has a message for her from someone. Maybe her grandpa?
Ok. Maybe that’s interesting.
But I think a more interesting story would be first Trevor, & Phoebe then maybe later joined by Ray and Podcast, they dig into Slimer as a character as he relates to the GB HQ & Ray. I think that’s a more interesting story by far & solves structural problems. Something where the characters we already know interact.
I didn’t mean to imply Ghostbusters movies can’t have drama. Only that the drama did not work in this movie and the only drama that did work was Ray’s midlife stuff.
Teen angst can work. But it’s a difficult needle to thread. The actor has to be right, the script, the storyline. Phoebe is a major drag on this movie. She isn’t vibing with the rest of it. She is not likeable for large portions which is a direct contrast with Afterlife.
The whole Spengler family drama is not an angle I find interesting or remotely care about.
Everytime that’s on screen I’m thinking “let’s go back to Ray and Podcast & Nadeem”
Sure scenes aren’t always meant to be fun but I should want to engage with it and not be put off, annoyed or bored.
Part of the issue is story real estate. Maybe this plot could work in an episodic TV show. But in a Ghostdbusters movie? Teen angst isn’t remotely one of the stories or characters I want to be presented with unless it’s being made fun of.
Phoebe has what can be described as a border line suicide attempt here. She’s clearly depressed, isolated, alone. And to be with the person she wants she “kills” herself. Sort of. Were they going for that sort of feeling?
Funny stuff am I right folks? No I know GB isn’t always non stop yucks but…that’s not ideal.
Kingpin wrote: ↑October 6th, 2025, 5:32 pmIt’s interesting. I seem to recall a lot of people wishing the movies could replicate what the cartoons did.GuyX wrote: ↑October 5th, 2025, 10:57 pm Lost perspective? Could u expand on that? That seems like an empty assertion when the perspective is the same.I'll try.
It feels at times that Melody/Phoebe plot thread's contribution to the plot gets considered by some as an inconvenience, instead of what it adds to both the film's plot and the wider landscape of the Ghostbusters world: it helps to show Phoebe's isolation, it gives her the realm to voice her frustration and disenfranchisement without needing to add in some sort of disembodied narration, it gives us some new lore on the types of ghosts in the Ghostbusters world (even a whole new perspective we've never seen in the film canon), and to show Garraka's machinations in getting himself out of the orb...
Removing that thread as it exists breaks the movie. I know that things can be rewritten to fill the hole, but I'm not convinced they could necessarily be written better, and I definitely don't think some tête-à-tête (or tête-à-balle visqueuse) would somehow be an improvement on what was written, and that's why I made the remark about losing perspective... Do you genuinely believe a collection of scenes with Phoebe conversing with Slimer would be more effective than conversing with a human ghost that's fully cognisant?
Sure, Ghostbusters II established some sort of comraderie between Louis and Slimer, but that joke was already played out 36 years ago, and given the things Phoebe was dealing with I think the more respectful approach was either what we got, or a small variation on the scenes we got... Rather than her Venting to Slimer and getting a silent shrug of solidarity.
I feel the Melody scenes did help advance the plot, even if it wasn't at a breakneck pace, I don't think the theoretical Slimer scenes would've.GuyX wrote: ↑October 5th, 2025, 10:57 pmMelody doesn’t work.I think she does work, if you're willing to let it.GuyX wrote: ↑October 5th, 2025, 10:57 pmWatching Phoebe pout, whine & be miserable? That’s not fun.GuyX wrote: ↑October 5th, 2025, 10:57 pm+ doing a half baked love story where the intent is clear but they’re too—for lack of better word—I dunno, “cowardly” to go all the way with it?I believe you can lay the blame for that one somewhat on Sony and on the wider Hollywood film studio executive culture. Sony has shown it's willingness to participate in events like Los Angeles pride, but I suspect that when it comes to their films they're like Disney, they go for a cowardly option of not having more overt LGBTQ+ content in their films to appease conservative overseas markets, and possibly also conservative studio executives, and not lose money through public boycotts.GuyX wrote: ↑October 5th, 2025, 10:57 pmIt surprises me that any1 thinks Slimer becoming more in line with the cartoons is a bad idea.I think it worked in the cartoon, I'm not convinced it would work in the films, as Michael detailed.
There definitely should've been a montage, though... Maybe the team dealing with increasingly ice-related cases popping up across the city.
I think Slimer is untapped live action real estate. I’ve seen Ghostbusters 2 quite a few times and showing two moments between Louis & Slimer hardly qualifies as “camaraderie”. Prejudging something as “played out” just isn’t how I feel one should look at things. Something is either funny or it’s not. It works or it doesn’t. It’s all in the execution. Can’t tell if it’s played out until it’s played.
I do wonder though if the dislike (not hate, dislike) of the Melody scenes stems from the frustration at seeing the original Ghostbusters so sparingly, I can understand feelings of resentment at the Melody scenes for their occupying screen time that could've been given to Ray, Winston, Janine and Peter... But... When the scenes also tie into furthering two of the film's main plot threads, they will naturally take priority over scenes tailored to please us old-school fans.So part of the reason Melody doesn’t work for me is I think she breaks the unspoken rules of the ghostbusters universe. As far as live action movies are concerned.
What is a ghostbusters ghost? Maybe that different for everyone. To me? It’s a spirit almost incognizant that they are a dead person. Or that they use to be a person. They just…are. Like a song stuck on repeat. They can’t be as they were in life.
Ghosts are pests, not thinking feeling, conversing things. They are like gnats. Flies. Roaches.
Now yes the Mayor says HE was talking to Fiorello La Guardia in GB2, but what that means isn’t clear. And we don’t see it.
I would contrast that with the big bads of the movies. Gozer isn’t a ghost. It’s a Demi god. And Vigo was a warlock thing.
We see ghosts getting off the titanic. And they look and behave like the ghosts we expect. We see a humanoid library ghost. She doesn’t say “Hey could you please be quiet, this is a library”. Just “Shhhhh”.
The ghosts in ghostbusters aren’t exactly who they were in the real world when they lived and the reason for that is…
Ghostbusting. You start having ghosts like Melody and suddenly you are bringing up the ethical dilemma of shooting and trapping a spirit. And maybe that’s an avenue some of you want explored. I don’t. That’s not what Ghostbusters is or should be for me.
Now if you have Melody unable to communicate with Phoebe and THATS WHY Phoebe uses the soul sucker machine? Phoebe thinks it’s the only way she can hear what Melody has to say? And Melody infers thru, I don’t know, chess moves or game playing, that she has a message for her from someone. Maybe her grandpa?
Ok. Maybe that’s interesting.
But I think a more interesting story would be first Trevor, & Phoebe then maybe later joined by Ray and Podcast, they dig into Slimer as a character as he relates to the GB HQ & Ray. I think that’s a more interesting story by far & solves structural problems. Something where the characters we already know interact.
The scenes in the films aren't always meant to be fun; the confrontation with Dean Yeager, Ray's mortification at the mortgages, Peter's argument with Peck once their banter has given way to their anger, Dana getting frustrated because she doesn't think Peter is taking her case seriously, the growing realisation that the guys are in serious legal trouble at the courthouse, the guys getting locked up in Parkview, learning that the Ghostbusters broke up after Egon left the others in New York, Phoebe learning there was a kindred spirit in the family that she didn't get to know.
I appreciate the teen angst is a new angle in the wider Ghostbusters world (not forgetting Extreme Ghostbusters of course), but I don't feel it's as alienating as you do, I view it as part of Phoebe's path to maturing into her grandfather's successor.
I didn’t mean to imply Ghostbusters movies can’t have drama. Only that the drama did not work in this movie and the only drama that did work was Ray’s midlife stuff.
Teen angst can work. But it’s a difficult needle to thread. The actor has to be right, the script, the storyline. Phoebe is a major drag on this movie. She isn’t vibing with the rest of it. She is not likeable for large portions which is a direct contrast with Afterlife.
The whole Spengler family drama is not an angle I find interesting or remotely care about.
Everytime that’s on screen I’m thinking “let’s go back to Ray and Podcast & Nadeem”
Sure scenes aren’t always meant to be fun but I should want to engage with it and not be put off, annoyed or bored.
Part of the issue is story real estate. Maybe this plot could work in an episodic TV show. But in a Ghostdbusters movie? Teen angst isn’t remotely one of the stories or characters I want to be presented with unless it’s being made fun of.
Phoebe has what can be described as a border line suicide attempt here. She’s clearly depressed, isolated, alone. And to be with the person she wants she “kills” herself. Sort of. Were they going for that sort of feeling?
Funny stuff am I right folks? No I know GB isn’t always non stop yucks but…that’s not ideal.
“Because they’re stupid that’s why!”
-Phil Leotardo
-Phil Leotardo





