- January 30th, 2013, 11:56 am#432669
This content received too many dislikes. Click SHOW to view
I was curious how different the GB logo would need to be to be considered parody and not be sued? I know most of you are not lawyers, just looking for ideas. For instance, if you completely changed the face but kept everything else is it still the GB logo? Or perhaps changed the face and hands and had him holding something? How much different does it have to be do you think?
AJ Quick liked this